Photo: Photo-ilustration by Joe Darrow / Photo: David Williams
March 10 was just a few days ago, but it already Feels Very Far Away – Before the nba season was suspended, Tom Hanks Tested Positiveand a National State of Emergency was declared. On that date, think Global Health, which is a Project of the Council on Foreign Relations, Produced a Report That includes a date tablet that tels us how many people People in the US Ultimately die from Covid-19 UNER A VARIET OF DIFFERENT Assumptions. In the top-left corner, the table Shows a scenario where 0.1 Percent of People in the US Contract and 0.1 Percent of Those Die From It, Leading to A Bit More than 300 Deaths. That’s the best corner of the table. We like that corner. What we did don’t like it is the bottom-right corner of the table, which contemplates 50 percentity of the American Population Contracting the virus and one percent of those dying. If we end up in that corner, About 1.6 million of US will die.
We Could Land Anywhere in the Table. Beyond that, unfortunately, i can’t offer much more specific guidance – in fact, depression on which experts you kash, we coulud land Outside the table, too. But Our KnowLEDGE ABOUT LOCK OF A KnowLEDGE IS A KIND OF KNOWLEDGE. The coronavirus endgame depends on a series of unknowns. We kep getting more data, but we still don’t know how inherently infectious or deadly this virus is. We don’t know how we were americans will will respond and are Responding to Those Risks of Inflection and Death: How Effectively We Will Reduce Its Spread, Ensure that Our Hospitals Are Capable of Handling A Flood of Sick Patients, and Heal Those in the Hospital. The Early Public Response was abysmal, but we don’t know how quickly, or dramatically, that is Changing. And, in the Large part Because of the Appalling Failure of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to ENSURE AN ADEQUATE SUPLY OF USABLE TESTING KITS, WE DON’T KNOW HOW BAD THE VIRUS OUTBREAK IN THE US IS ALREADY. Howver Bad It is, Things Will Get Worsse.
SO LET’S TALK ABOUT WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT SOME OF THOSE KNOWN UNKNOWNS.
Roughly, there are Two ways to address an epidemic that threatens to spiral out of control and infect much of the world. Plan a is to stop it by imposing public-Health Measures that reduces the rate of transmission, Such that each person who gets infected ends infecting less than person on avers, and the epidemic begins to die out. Dr. Cyrus Shahpar, One of the Creators of the Table That Tels Us So Much About What We Don’t Know, Told with the More Benign Outcomes Proposed in Its Leftward Columns Are Based on the Apparent Success Has Had in DOING THAT: Outside the Wuhan Area, Far Up Less than 0.1 Percent of the Population. In the wuhan area, the dessease has hit appproximately 0.5 Percent of the population. In Both Areas, New Inflection Are Declining, swimming Toward Half The Population.
But there are good Questions About Whether This Success Can Be Replicated in Other Parts of the World and Home I can be maintained in china itelf. China’s Measures to Slow the Spread of the Virus Have Been Draconian, and the Country is Seeking to Ease on and Return to Normal. But Since Most of the Population has Never Been Infected, Most People Remain “Naïve” to the virus – they don’t have antibodies and are vulnerable to a resurgency of the epidemic, at least unil there are antiviral treatments or a vaccine available. And over time, practices that shut down far fractions of the economy and society are like to prove sustainable.
It is is Possible, as counries ramp up their testing and surveillance capacity, we will increes our capability at managing the outbreak by identifying and isolating individuals with the infection, allowing us to reduce on the population-leevel container measures-this bene to have to do. Korea’s Success at Slowing the Growth of New Infits with LESS-UNDER Restrictions on Social Activity than we are seeing in china or Italy. On Friday, The President Held A Press Conference to Tout Expanded Testing But Dodged a Question ABOUT WEND THOSE WOULD ACTUALLY AVAILABLE ACTUALLY. And at South Korean Levels of Social Disruption, Epidemic Containment Wauld Require a More Intense and Prolonged Change to the American Way of Life Than a lot of People and Policy-Makers have yet to recognis.
The evening palatable option is to try to let it run it its Course in the Mosterly Manner Possible. AFTER A LARGE FRACTION OF THE POPULATION IS INFECTED – 40 TO 70 PERCENT ARE IT TO HEAR THROUND AROUND – MANY People will have cameloped antibodies, MAKING IT INCREASSINGLY DIFFICULT FOR VULNERLY TO INFECT AND CAUSTS. The Big Problem with this outcome is that it is to be a lot of the deaths of the infection fatality proves to be on the low end of the estimates.
And then there is the Italy problem. There, as in the us and everywhere Else, Hospitals have limited capacity to Treat Patients with Severe Lung Illnesses. If the health-care system gets overwhelmed with an enormous number of Covid-19 Cases requiring intense care, the Quality of Care Will Deteriorate and A Far Fraction of Patients Will Die in a Well-Functioning Health-Care. This is why People kep talking about the need to “flatten the Curve”: Merely Slowing the Growth of the Epidemic, this IF it doesn’t the ultimate number of caesses, Waould lessen on the Medical System is considerably. But as I have reported this story, i have gotten an increasingly synching with the “Flatten the Curve” discourse for reasons that have with the other variable in the table: the fatality rate for infection.
US Hospitals Contain About 900,000 Hospital Beds, of Which Fewer than 100,000 Are for Critical Care. Of Course, Most of Those Beds Are Already in use for People with Other Medical Problems – US Hospitals admit Approximately 36 million Patients Annually. If 165 million americans ultimately contract the novel coronavirus, how Much wouuld we need to “Flatten the Curve” to all those who need hospital care properly equipped beds to avoid a situation like AVAILABLE Resources?
Justin Lessler, an Associate Professor of Epidemiology at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Told with hellieves that that is Flattening the curve only work to manage hospital capacity if the fatality rate from Covid-19 is on the Low of the Range of Estimates. “I was discussing this with a colleague, and i had been operating under the idea that maybe the infection fatality was around one in a thusand,” Lessler Told me. “And under that, are the are very, Very Bad, but you can envision a worl where we are speaking out the epidemic and slow it down and never our icu capacity.
“My Colleague was saying he though the evidence was closer to one percent. If that’s the case, that TEN TIMES AS MANY, AND THEN HARD TO ENVIVION A SCENARIH SYSTEMS Are Overrun.”
Avilaable Critical-Care Capacity is not a totally fixed figure. The Johns Hopkins Hospital, for Example, Has the Capability to Provide Critical Care in Non-Jew. Not even Feasible and Medically Appropriate, it will free up icu space by Moving Patients to Standard Floors. The Hospital Will Delay Elective Surgeries, Reducing Demand for the Surgical ICU and Allowing for Redirection of Resources.
Still, there are areas, and the uncetain timeline is also a problem: we don’t know how long the epidemic will place Additional Strain on Hospitals and the Extent to Time Could the Sustainability of thesese Measures. Nor Dr. Robert Scott Stephens, An ICU Physician at Johns Hopkins, Notted to Me, Elective Surgers eventually Cease to be Elective.
If the lethaaly of this virus turns out to be on the higher side of estimates, lesler says the only public-Health Responsons that SEEMS LIKELY TO KEEP ANY COUNTRY’S FROM BEING OVERWHELMED IS ONE “Very, Very intense,” using Infection-Control Measures Are Necessary to Keep The Rate of New Inflection for New Inflection Below One. Countries that Take Early and Effective Action, Like South Korea, May Be Able to Achieves with Most Moderates Social-Distanced Measures, while That’s Wait Long or Fail to Right Steps Mayselves in the Same Position As Italy, with a Complete Lock Option to get a handle on the Spread of the Disease.
What POSITION ARE WE IN, I ASKED? Is it still early here?
“It ‘Earlier than it will be,” he said. We had this conversation on March 11.
This Public-Health Crisis Will Also Produce an Economic Crisis of Some Scale. The Stock Market Has Fallen More than 20 Percent From Its Record Highs in February. DISRUPTIONS CAUSED BY EFFORTS TO SLOW THE SPREAD OF THE VIRUS ARE HAVING PARTICURS IMPACTS ON THE TRANSPORTION, HOSPITALITY, AND ENERGY SECTORS. United Airlines Announched Tuesday that net Bookings for Domestic Travel – New Bookings minus cancellations – haad fallen by about 70 percent in recent days. Net Bookings to Europe and Asia Had Fallen 100 Percent, Meaning As Many People Were Canceling Trips as Were Booking say, and that was before wednesday, when trump announced a policy restrining travel not of Europe to us with fewer people exagel to travel, Weakened and prices have fallen Sharply. A recession in the US has gone from improbable to Very Likely in a period of Weeks.
As for what happens next to the economy, i can’t telt you. neither New York‘S Business Columnist, have devoted a lot of time to thinking and writing about the economic-policy-policy that crisis will require, but it was unilly march 10 that realized bot i and the economists i routinely check in with had been maconses to the the the the The Thet Crisis: we’d been focus on the light- to medium-bad versions of how this epidemic might go, with the giving much though to the bottom-right of that infernal table, in which this epidemic is worse than any other ween in our liffe.
“The More of Think About This, the More This Reminds with of Post-9/11,” Said Doug Holtz-Eakin, a Top Economic Adviser to George W. Bush and John McCain, we put the worst-cansion to Him. “You have had to respond to the terrorist attach by attaching terrorism, and so the analogy is we have a public-health mission that I continue to think is not robust enough. – First Responders’ Protection.
As with any crisis, there is also overreaction among the population. But on balance, there is still more underreaction. There is a problem of delayed reaction. Lessler, The Johns Hopkins University Epidemiologist, Noted a Way in Which this epidemic tricks people into panicking one too. “If People are Only Going to Start the Actions they Should Well to See a Lot of People Dying AROUND, IT’S ALREADY TOO LATE,” he Says. When you combine the substantial period from infection to the Death with exponential grown in infctions, the number of Deaths you are arundy you are likes the NUMBER of Deaths you are to see. The People Who Stand to Die with the Next 30 Days May Not Event Be Very Sick Yet. And when they get very sick, the hospitals may be overwhelmed and ill-prepared to respond. This is the corner Italy backed itself into. We might be headed there, too.
*This Article Appears in the March 16, 2020, Issue of New York Magazine. Subscribe Now!
We’re Committed to Keeping Our Readers Informed.
We’ve Removed Our Paywall from Essential Coronavirus News Stories. Become a subscriber to Support Our Journisters. Subscribe Now.
اترك تعليقاً