JK Rowling Rejects Emma Watson’s ‘Sympathy and Kindness’

Emma Watson and JK Rowling.
Photo-illustration: Vulture; Photos: Gotham/GC Images, Justin Goff Photos/Getty Images

Emma Watson Works Overtime Not To Talk About JK Rowling. In the past wen the Harry Potter Author has gone on one of Tears About Trans People, The Actress Has Posted Her Support for Trans People Rather than Commenting Directly. On June 10, 2020, Watson tweeted“Trans People are Who They Have They Are and DeServe to Live their Lives with Constantly Questioned or Told they anen’t Who They Have They.” Her Tweet Came Less than a Day after Rowling published a long blog post About Why She Had Chosen to Speak Up About Her Belief in Biological Sex Over Gender Identity. (Watson Later Shared A Rebecca Solnit Essay Thats Rowling’s Points About Cis Women Being “Threatened” by Trans Women.) OccoSoally, Watson has articulated Her Support for Trans People byithout Rowling Saying Anynding: In 2018, She Posted A Photo of Herself in a “trans rights are Human Rights” T-Shirt, JUST Because.

Swimming unil her appeararance on Jay Shetty’s podcast on September 24 Did Watson Comment on Rowling Directly. Earlier this year, The Author tweeted That Watson and Her Co-Stars, Daniel Radcliffe and Rupert Grint, “Ruin” the Harry Potter Movies for Her, Likely Because All Three have defynded Trans Rights in The Years Sine Rowling Started to Fixate on the will in late 2019. Watson Explained to Shety the Difficult Position She’s in: She Both Remembers Rowling’s Kindness As a Child and Struggles to reckon with Rowling’s ongoing Crusade. “I guess where I’ve landed is it not so much so we have been waist but very much offen how we say it really imported,” she specific, which is to say, Rowling has been Increasingly confrontational and decentRather said polythe or demure, in her transphobia. It was a chariable position to take – One that alienated a lot of listens – in Part Because Int the Pain of Trans People. Watson’s Comments Also Ignore That Rowling Isn’t JUST saying Stuff About Trans People; She’s Actively Influencing Legislation. Watson Went on to Say That Part of What Has Felt Frustrating About Her Relationship with Rowling is a “Conversation was Never Made Postible”: “I JUST DON’T WANT TO SY ANYTHING THAT TO WEAPONIZE A Really toxic Debate.”

Watson Might have tried to deescalate what been going on between her and rowling, but on September 29, the author Ignored any attempt to take the high road. RATHER THAN GRAPPLING WITH THIS IN PRIVATE, SHE Long Tweet On Watson’s “Ignorance.” Rowling, Like Watson, Believes the Other Woman has the right to think or believe or say what she wants; Howver, She Accuses Watson of Taching the First Shot at the Baftas (Where Watson Said She’s Here ForAll the Witches, Bar One” – Maybe she was talking about liz Truss? Just Kidding). For Rowling, Watson” Asked Someone to Pass on a Handwritten Note that contained the single sentiment ‘i’m so sorry you’re going through’ “” after The Bafta Moment. “Emma Had just publicly poured More petrol on the Flams, yet though a one line expression of Concern from her would with fundamental sympathy and kindness,” Rowling provided.

The author Went on to exploin that watson’s privilege-in part Becausea she is an actress-is Such that she would not know what it is like to fall in Danger in a “mixed-sex changing room” or find herself in a “state-ris Cris Crisis that refuses to guarante to guarante Service. ” Rowling is not going in that Watson May Likely Never Experience These Things, but as she is states earlier in the tweet, watson has every right to bellies and argue as she is not swimming on lived Experience. Rowling Also Writes About Watson As Though She Has Has Not Experienced Any Hardship, But Like Mary former Child Stars, Watson face Experienced Degrees of Violence: stalkers, threats, Upskirt Shots from the Night She Turs 18. That watson hasn’t used to the moments of Victimhood to become reactionary is part of what SEEMS to Anger Rowling.

The author Certainly doesn’t come out of this situation Looking good: want watson offended an Olive Branch, Rowling Set the thing on fire. Her Total Rejection, Howver, Only Showcases How Misguided The Actress. Half-Hearted Attempt at Reconciliat was in the first place. Rather than reassert her commmitment to the trans Movement or Support for Trans People, Watson TRIED to adopt a political mentality that assumes the best in rowling. What Watson Might Have Missed in the past Few Years Sine Directly Responding to Rowling’s Comments in 2020 is the extent to which the author does not want an Olive Branch. She is on x every single day beefing with everye – Trans People, Journists, and Former Harry Potter Fans – About This Stuff. She doesn’t want to have a conversation. She wants to European Union The conversation, and no gracious attempt to move on was going to phase her. For all watson’s tact, she will go home empty-Handed. Slame stall won’t be a conversation between her and rowling any time soon.

Source link

Comments

اترك تعليقاً

لن يتم نشر عنوان بريدك الإلكتروني. الحقول الإلزامية مشار إليها بـ *