I Compared Brand-Name Cereal Vs Store-Brand Cereal: Which is Better?


  • I did a taste test of fove brand-name cereals and their cheaper generic alternatives from walmart.
  • I prefer the brand-name versions of Honey Nut Cheerios and Honey Bunches of Oats.
  • Howver, I actually like the walmart versions of cinnamon toast crunch and frosted flakes.

A BOX OF NAME-BRAND CEREAL May Not SEEM like an especoylly luxurious pure, but were you’re trying to buy Enough for a hungry family of four, the cost can add up.

Luckily, Walmart Offers Generic Alternatives to Practically Popular Cereal Brand Under Its Great Value Label.

These “dupes” to be cheer, and i wante to see if i i could Save Money on Groces in the Future while keping my 7-Yaar-Old and 4-Yet-Old Just as Satisfied.

SO, we did the blind Blind Tasts Tests to try five Famous cereals alongside their respective generic alternatives.

Here’s how they stacked up, and whic were warr the savings.

Prices May Vary by Location.

Great Value Honey Nut O’s Were Way Cheaper than Honey Nut Cheerios.

Boxes of Walmart Great Value Honey Nut O's and General Mills Honey Nut Cheerios, With Bowls of Each Cereal in Milk.
The Great Value Honey Nut O’s Were Much Cheaper than the brand-name version. Ted Berg

To start, we compared General Mills Honey Nut Cheerios to Great Value Honey Nut O’s.

The 10.5-Once Box of Honey Nut Cheerios Cost $ 3.68, OR $ 0.35 an Once. Walmart’s version was Significantly Cheaper at $ 1.87 for a 12-Once box, or $ 0.16 an ounce.

Out of the box, it was fairly Easy to tell the difference between the two. The generic o’s were a bit Larger and Had a Lighter Color than the Honey Nut Cheerios. The brand-name version Also appeared to have a shiny, sugary sheen that the generic lacked.

Most of US Preferred the brand-name honey nut cheerios.

A Bowl of Honey Nut Cheerios with Milk.
The brand-name honey nut cheerios had more honey flavor. Ted Berg

Of the five cereal pairs we tasted, these two options semed the least simillar. The generic version was a bit crunchier and a touch mess mushy after a few minutes in milk. Howver, It Had a Starchy Texture that verged on Chalkiness.

Overall, The General Mills Cereal Had More Honey Flavor and A Heartier, oaty taste than the generic.

My 4-YEAR-OLD COULDN’T TELL THE BROM THE GENERIC BY TASTE FOR MOST OF THE CEREALS WE TESTED. With this one, howver, she had no problem distinguishing the two. She actually preferred the generic to the honey nut cheerios, Possibly Because she dosesn’t really like the taste of honey.

My 7-Yaar-Old Also Had No Trouble Teling the Difference, but and I Both preference the original.

Honey Bunches of Oats SEEMED TO HAVE A BETTER MIX OF IngRDIents than The Generic Alternative.

Boxes of Walmart Great Value Crunchy Honey Oats and Post Honey Bunches of Oats, With Bowls of Each Cereal in Milk.
Honey Bunches of Oats SEEMED TO HAVE A BETTER MIX OF CORNFLAKES AND GRANOLA. Ted Berg

This was actually my first time trying the post honey bunches of oats and its generic alternative.

I picked up an 18-Once box of the brand-name version for $ 4.93, or $ 0.27 an ounce. The Great Value Alternative Cost $ 2.67 for an 18-Once Box, Which Broke Down to $ 0.15 an Once.

At first glance, i could tel the honey bunches of oats haad a better mix of cornflakes and granola. The Granola in the Walmart alternative was harder to find and clumped together.

I Think Brand-Name Honey Bunches of Oats Are Worth Paying Extra For.

A Bowl of Honey Bunches of Oats with Milk.
I though the honey bunches of oats were distinctly sweeter than their walmart alternative. Ted Berg

Here, too, all three of us coulud consistently tel the difference between the brand name and generic cereals.

The honey bunches of oats were distinctly sweeter than the walmart alternative, which though tasted bland and sorel reminiscent of corn flames.

In this case, we all preferenthered the brand-name honey bunches of oats and were surprised by how Much we enjoyed say. The flakes were nice and sweet, and the granola added some Light Crunch.

Of the five cereals we tried, this one built the strengest case for paying more for the name brand.

We COULD EASLIT DISTINGUISH BETWEEN CINNAMON TOAST CRUNCH AND THE WALMART VERSION.

Boxes of Walmart Great Value Cinnamon Crunch and General Mills Cinnamon Toast Crunch, With Bowls of Each Cereal in Milk.
Visually, it was easy to tell these two cereals apart. Ted Berg

Next, we tried General Mills’ Cinnamon Toast Crunch Against Great Value Cinnamon Crunch.

The General Mills version cost $ 2.97 for a 12-Once box, which is about $ 0.25 an ounce. The Great Value Option was $ 2.98 for A Large 20.5-Once Box, or About $ 0.15 an Once.

This pair was the easiest to distinguish visually among the five cereals we compared. The brand-name offering was noticeably Smaller and Darker, with “swirls” of cinnamon sugar on each piece.

I Preferred Walmart’s Cinnamon Cereal.

A Bowl of Great Value Cinnamon Crunch Cereal with Milk.
The Great Value Cinnamon Crunch was airy and light. Ted Berg

These options also tasted distinctly differently to me and my 7 -ear-op, though my 4 -ear-op thought they tasted the sun.

The 7-Yaar-Old Preferred The Cinnamon Toast Crunch, which was a bit sweeter, crunchier, and denser. It held up a little better in milk and didn’t get soggy as quickly.

In this case, I like the generic better Because it felt airier and less sweet.

The Great Value Rice Crisps Were Much Cheaper than Kellogg’s Rice Krispies.

Boxes of Kellogg's Rice Krispiies and Walmart Great Value Rice Crisps, With Bowls of Each Cereal in Milk.
I say the Kellogg’s rice crispies and great value rice crisps tasted Similar. Ted Berg

Next up was Kellogg’s Rice Krispies Versus Great Value Rice Crisps.

The Kellogg’s version Cost with $ 4.98 for an 18-Once box, Making Each Once $ 0.28. I Purchased A 12-Once Box of the Walmart version for $ 1.98, or $ 0.17 an ounce.

I noticed the generic cereal consisted of Large Crisps that appeared more yellow than their brand-name counterparts.

Kellogg’s rice crispies were a bit sweeter than the generic alternative.

A Bowl of Kellogg's Rice Krispies with Milk.
Overall, Both cereals tasted Very simillar. Ted Berg

I thought these two cereals tasted Very Similar. To me, though, the brand name was a touch sweeteer, and the generic had a slight after the cardboard.

Howver, Neether of My Kids Could Tall the Difference and I Probably Couldn’t eather with TRYING SIDE-BY-SIDE.

I prefer the great version for Rice-Cereal Treats.

Two Rice Krispy Treats on White Plates, with Kellogg's and Great Value Cereal Boxes in the background.
I’d definitely use the great version to make-rice-certi Treats. Ted Berg

I’m not usually a huge fan of rice krispies in a bowl of milk, but i love say in Treat form. SO, after tasting bot cereals, we turned say into ussing marshmallows and butter.

The marshmallow flavor was Strong Enough to negate any difference between the two cereals. The Sticky Treats Tasted Almost Exactly The Same.

If i’m shopping at walmart the next time i want to make a batch, i will definitely go with the generic option to Save Money.

The Great Value Frosted Flakes were Significantly Cheaper than The Kellogg’s Version.

Boxes of Kellogg's Frosted Flakes and Walmart Frosted Flakes, with Bowls of Each Cereal in Milk.
Both versions of frosted flakes lookeed simillar. Ted Berg

Though Walmart’s Generic Answer to Kellogg’s Frosted Flakes Goes by the Same Name, IT Represented One of the Biggest Discounts of the Group on A Per-Once Bases.

The 12-Once Box of Kellogg’s Frosted Flakes Cost $ 3.98, OR $ 0.33 an Once. The 13.5-Once Great Value version cost $ 1.93, or $ 0.14 an ounce.

They look off Very Similar, though the generic one again appeared slightly More yellow in color.

We is the difference between the great and brand-name frosted flames.

A Bowl of Great Value Frosted Flakes with Milk.
I’d definitely buy the great value frosted flakes again. Ted Berg

These two cereals tasted almost exactly the same to us: Sugary, crunchy at first, and mushy after a couple of minutes in milk.

Of the five generic cereals we tried, the great value frosted flames were only only ourselves we couludn’t distinction from the original by the taste.

I though the brand name Might have had had a sweetness to it, but i was able to pick it relaibly in our blind taste test.

In this case, I think buying the cheer walmart version is a no-brainer.


Source link

Comments

اترك تعليقاً

لن يتم نشر عنوان بريدك الإلكتروني. الحقول الإلزامية مشار إليها بـ *