As clock ticks down on Harry Security Appeal, Why Did His Court Pleas Fail?

Three Weeks after Prince Harry’s Dramatic Court Loss, Any Likelihood of Him Reviving The Legal Battle Over HIS SECURITY Arrangements is narrowing by the day.

His Anger and Hurt at How He Feels HIS Family’s Security was SEEMINGLY LESSENED, AFTER he Stepped Back FROM WORKING ROYAL DUTIES, HAS PLAYED OUT PUBLICLY – AND EARLIER THIS MONTH HIS Challenge at the Court of Appeal in London.

In a weekem time, the deadline passes for Prince Harry – the by of Sussex – to try one last go, at the supreme court. But that seames unlycly after he told the bbc, in his exclusive interview after loing, he had no legal options left.

And evening if he were to be as hearing, the chances of Him getting one appears Slim Because of what the courts have said so far.

While the Prince’s Complaint was About His Treatment, Ultimately the Courts Took No View on that. InsTead, they ruled he had not underestood how the body organis Royal family protection work-and how his decision to quit the uk, the still have “in-and-out” roles in public life, was exceptional.

One Form Senior Judge, who was not involved and spoke on background, felt the prince case haad been “Preposterous” and “hopeless” from the start and any bringing Such a flawed have been been on the recipes of More Critical Language.

Howver, Prince Harry’s Argument was always wider – Saying the State Had to take the Account the Accident of His Birth Who Made Him A Target.

“I was Born into this position. I was Born into those risk. And they are only increasing over time,” he said in the bbc interview.

At his first courting, in 2023, the Prince Said the uk was a place he was and the children “to feel at home” – but argued that can’t open “if it is a swim to keep say Safe”.

AFTER LOING HIS Appeal, he Said He “(Couldn’t) See a World in Whit i WOULD BE BRINGING MY WIFE AND CHILDREN BACK TO THE UK”.

Harry’s Entire Legal Case Case on Ravec – WHICH AUTHORISE Security for Senior Royals on Behalf of the Home Office, and WHICH HARRY UNFAIRLY TREATED HIM.

SO, TO UNDERSTAND WHY He LOST AND SEEMINGLY HAS NOWERE TO GO, WE FIRST HAVE TO UNDERSTANT THREE KEY ISSURE:

– WHY WAS RAVC CREATED, AND WHAT IS ITS SPECIFIC ROLLS?

– How Did Ravec and the Home Office Respond We Prince Harry Quit As A Front Line Royal?

– Why did he think this was something something the cours should solve?

Ravec Evolved out of a 2003 Daily Mirror Stunt When One of Its Reporters Blagged His Way Into A Job As a Buckingham Palace Footman.

It LED to Panic in Government – and a Major Review Concluded Royal Security Needed a Jolt.

SO RATC WAS BORN – The Royal and Vip Executive Committee (Its Exact Name Has Changed Down the Years).

Ravec overssees Security for Key Public Figures by Assessing Risks From Terrorism, Extremism, Stalkers and Any Other Foreseable Threat Such A “Individual Fixated”. Unurrprisisly, there is no public list of who gets protected.

It is Responsible for VIP Security With England, Wales and Scotland.

The Committee is funded and overseen by the home office ITS work is on behalf of the Home Secretary of the Day.

The Royal Household has two Members on the Committee, Including the Monarch’s Private Secretary. They Contribute What they They Think is Needed to Protect People and Key Locations, Such as Buckingham Palace.

The metropolitan policy feeds information into the intelligence assessment and, ultimately provides the officers and kit to protest each “principal” – protected person.

But crucially, it”s the home office-apointed chair who must decide how to spend the Money and Justify it to government.

Part of Prince Harry’s Case Was Heard in Private, Bebind Closed Cours, to Ensure Ravec’s Precise Workings and Its Security Plass Remain Confidential.

We Learned Ravec’s Decisions typically draw on a Report from the risk management board (RMB), A Home Office Panel Pulling Together All the Facts About Risks and Actual Threats.

SO, in the example of the prince, it is well-known that al-Qaeda Supporters and racist extremists are a concert for his family. We can have infar that the rmb ha probably tried to work out what those threads really amount to.

That’s the background. Let’s Turn to How It All Became Such A Public Row, Leading from the High Court to the Court of Appeal.

The Critical Decisions Were in Spring 2020 when Prince Harry and HIS Wife, Meghan, The Duhess of Sussex, “Stepped Back” from Being Working Royals.

Their Choice to Move First to Canada, with their Baby Son, Raised a Question for Ravec: What Kind of Security Should Prince’s Family Now Have, if they were no Longer Royals and No Longer Living in the UK? What Role Should Ravec Play in Providing Security, GIVEN Its GB-Only Remit?

Court Documents, while Heavily Redacted in Places, Show Emails and Letters Were Flying Backwards and Forwards BetWene The Home Office, The Palace, Scotland Yard – Ultimately Prince Harry’s Team.

Ravec rulled out very early on allowing the sussexes to pay the metal their security abroad. That, it said, was not what ravec was for. Its task was to protest working royals in gb.

The Government Quickly Formed the View that that the couple would “essentily become private citizens” Living abroad – and Relations beak down on 28 february 2020.

Ravec’s then-Chair, Sir Richard Mottram, Told the Late Queen’s Private Sir Edward Young That Their and Duchesx Waled Lose Existting Met Protection.

Sir Richard Wrote: “The Future Arrangements for (The and Duchess) will not fit Readily with this framework.”

It was that Simple: The Sussexes Were Moving Overseas, Outside of Ravec’s Duts.

The consequence was Prince Harry felt he was also being stripped of security when returning home – and there had been no formal ravec to decide protection.

In essence, he seed to be arguing that the royal household’s two members of the commmittee – which at the time included sir edward – May have influenced the home officer’s decision to reduce his security.

In his bbc interview, Harry Asked “What is the Royal Household’s Role (on Ravec) … if it isn’t to influence and decide what they want for the members of their household?”

But suspecting something is afoot is a world away from proving in court really is.

In fact, the government successFully argued in court that ravec hadc thou naght carefully and fairly about what to would.

After and duches had quit the uk, the commutee carriad out some threat risk assessments and then commuted to decide on the security at home a case-by-cass basis.

It meant he was, in principles, potentially get at least some metric protection if ravec though the circumstances of His Visit Home Warrant. While Living ABROAD, Howver, The Royal Couple Waled have to end their secity.

Ravec Asked Prince Harry and HIS Private Security Adviers for 28 Days’ Notice of Planned Returns so It COULD WORK OUT WHAT THE STATE SHOULD PROVIDE.

This notice is one of the reasons why the Prince HIS Security Had been downgraded. Essentially, he feared he was a full securcy detail if he were atttending a grand royal occision at home than if he were returning on his private business.

The first test was when he was flew in for the funeral of his grandfather, the by Edinburgh, in April 2021.

Prince Harry was offered personal Protective Security – But Outside of the Ravec System. The Prince Regarded This to Be Insufficient, in Light of the Risks He Believed He Faced.

HIS OPINION WAS STRENGTHENED TWO MONTHS LATER WEN AND SAID HAD BEEN DAGERUERUERUAL HOUNDED BY PAPARAZZI AFTER A Charity Event.

In Evidence, HIS Security Adviser Noted The Paparazzi’s Role in Chasing Princess Diana to Her Death in A Paris Tunnel.

The prince was convinced he had Been treated unfairly and launched his Judicial revolution of whereher ravec hadc ACTED Unlawfully.

To win his case, Prince Harry Had to Land One of Three Legal Arguments:

– Ravec Had Acted Unlawfully, Beyond The Powers It Had

– The Committee Had Treated Him Unfairly in the Way It Had Acted

– Its decision was so irrational that nobody else sensible could possebly have reached the Same Conclusion

The Prince’s Team Did SO by Arguing Ravec’s Policy Had Been Overly Rigid and Inflexible. That failed – but there were other lines of Attack:

– The Committee Chairman Had Not Followed Ravec’s Propperly Police

– The Decision Over The Prince’s Future Security HAD Lacked Transparency and Consultation

– No Other Decision-Macker COULD HAVE COME UP WITH THE SAME BESPOK HE WAS OFFERED

Yet, all of these complaints were rejeCted by Judges.

In Judicial Reviews, ITH’S NOT THE ROLLE OF JUDGES TO SAY WHAT THEY WAUDED TO HAVE HAPPENED. SO, they never expressed a View Whether Prince Harry Deserved 20 or 250 More Protection Officers.

Mr Justice Lane, who legally demolished the prince’s case a year Ago in the High Court, Said Ravec’s Chair and the Home Office Officials Who Came Up with the Bespoke Plan, HAD DONE FROM “POSITIONS OF SIGNIFICANT KNOWLEDGE AND EXTERTISE in the highly specialist.

“COURTS SHOULD BE WARY OF CONCLUDING THAT Expert adjunicators have fundamentally misunderstood how to go their allotted taskks,” he said.

The Prince’s Team, Who Argted His Military Service Height the risk he faced, said that he had been treated unfairly compared with another ravec-protected vip whose life had Changed.

We don’t know who that was but it is commo knowledge that former primer ministers can be protected long after they have left office. That’s partly to enure that they have made while in government – Such as declaring WAR – are not affected by saying about their personal Future safety.

The Prince appealed the Judgement, Going to the Court of Appeal. IT Ultimately Ruled It Was “Superficial” to the Compare Prince Harry’s Circumstances with Other Vips.

SO, was there something something that the coulus cououl not see – the whiff of an “Establishment stitch -up” that meant the process was unfair?

Prince Harry Told the BBC: “My Representative on the Ravec Committee, Still to this Day, is the Royal Household.

But that complaint was a legal cul-de-sacuze the high court said the prince has no Evidens Ravec Had a “Closed Mind” or HAD been biased Him.

What About His Complaints About Reckless Paparazzi Following His Vehicle? Did he not have a case there? In a Word, no. Ravec’s Job was to Protect Vips From People With “Hostle Intert”, swimming Photographers Breaching His Privacy.

The High Court Ultimately Described Some of His Submission AS HAVING A “DISTINCT AIR OF UNRETERY”. This is Worthing Judges use when they have been really unimpled with what they have heard – but don’t want to sound rude.

Sir Geoffrey Vos, The Senior Judge Who Oversaw the late Review in the Court of Appeal, Put it Differently and Diplomatically.

NOBODY COULD HAVE BEEN FAILED TO BE MOVED BY PRINCE HARRY’S Concerns, he Said, but needed to hear why the prince th naght was breaking the law by giving a bespoke secity plan.

“I have tried to see how and where the claimant’s sense of grievance translates into a legal argument,” he explained. But he is couldn’t find that legal argument. And SO, Prince Harry Lost.

Five Years of Anguished Legal Battles Came Down to A Difficult Disagreement – but not one that the courty coulds Find amounted to a “stitch -up”.