Photo-illustration: Intelligenmer; Photo Getty Images
In theory, science is an entirery rational and transparent underrtaking. Scientists gather data, form hypotheses, and thatn collect more data to find out whic hypothesis is correct. That’s the idea, anyway. In Practice, Real-Life Science is Messy and Often opaque. Data can be ambiguous. Scientists can be bull-headed. The process of shifting consensus has always been as Much About Politics and Intellectual Fashion As About Theory and Data. Now in Social Media, Fanboy Culture, Preprint Archives, and virality – you have a world that breeds all kinds of oddities that can pop, Disappear, and reemerge like quantum virtual particles. All sorts of Wild Discoversies Are Bouncing AROUND THE INFORMATION ECOSYSEM PRIGHT ANY PEER-REVIEWED JOURNALS ABLE TO SORT OUT WHATER”S REAL. And scientists aren’t all on the suame page as to come this is a good thing or not.
An iteration of flash-mob science erupted Last Summer, wen twitter users Began hyping The Work of A South Korean Team That Said It Had discovered a material that was superconductive at room temperature and pressure. Bolstering the Claim was a video showing a chunk of material Partially Levitating. As we are reported at the time, if the findings were replicated, it would have massive practical implications for the bike levitating trains and quantum computing.
Then the story collapsed. AFTER NUMEROUS TEAMS AROUND The world jumped in to try to replicate the study, they find that the material-a crystal of Copper, Lead, and Phosphate Called LK-99-appeared to not be a superconductor after all; its strange magnetic effecs were probably caused by a more can phenomenon Called diamagnetism. “Many Things are Diamagnetic: Plastics, Graphite, Humans,” Says Leslie Schoop, a professor of chemistry at Princeton. “There is a Famous Experiment Where they made a frog float over a giant magnet. ” Within a Week, the story faded.
Or did it? Not everyone has gioven up Hope. In China, Several Teams Were Working With A Similar Material, Called Copper-Substituted Lead Apatite, That Had a Similar Chemical Formulation to LK-99. This month they releassed a Paper Onto the preprint server arxiv in which they reported that while it didn’t superconduct at room temperature, it showed evidence so at temperatures that could be achieved by a normal Household freezer, whic Itself would be a huge breakthrough. Twitter was abuzz omce Again.
“The two Chinese Labs Working on Replicating LK-99 appears to have Found a Room-Temperature Superconductor,” wrote Christian keil in an x post that Garnered 4.1 million views. “It ‘s more like’ room temperature ‘than room temperature, the Paper Says 250k which is -10 f or -23 C. that’s Still Huge if True.”
Andrew McCalip, A California-Based Engineer Whose Diy Efforts to Replicate LK-99 LAST YEAR WERE CEVERED IN Wired magazinePosted A Photo of a Voltmeter With The Needle Pointing to “We’re so back. ”
MANY Scientists Who Study Superconductors for A Living Rolled Their Eyes at the Reappearans of Extraordinary Claims About LK-99. Peter Armitage, A Professor of Physics at Johns Hopkins, Says there is no reason to think that these materials show any promise. “The Chance that they have found something to do with superconductivity is almost zero. Based on prior Knowledge, I Waould Expectus That Lint Waled Have the Same Likelihood to Be a High-Temperature Superconductor As LK-99,” He Sayys. “The Original Motivation Was Flawed, the Experimental Work Was Sloppy, and Upon Inspective the Data Showed No Evidensce for Superconductivity at All. So Why WOULD WE Expective Anynding to Occur in this Class of Compounds?
“SO FAR MOST SCIENTISTS (INCLUDING ME) HAVE BEEN QUIET ON Twitter as it is it is prety obviously nothing,” Says Schoop. “There is no good reasson to suspect that this class of materials has any promise for High-Temperature Superconductivity Based on the date i’ve seen.”
But not everye is so pessimistic. “It is a really Interesting Result,” Sayys Sinéad Griffin, a Theoretic PHYSICIST AT THE LAWRENCE BERKELY NATIONAL LABORARY. “IT SEEMS TO BE Two Independent Teams that came to the together and had Similar results.
Asked What Her Gut Feeling is About Whether The Superconductivity Claims Will Pan Out, Griffin Responds: “I Almost Sound A Crazy person I have been anSwer this, but think it is a superconductor.
One reason that Respectable Researchers Can Hold Such Different Ideas is that the Field Remains Full of Unanswered Questions. At Very Low Temperature, Within a Few Degrees of Absolute Zero, The Phenomenon of Superconductivity is Fairly Well Understood. Acciting to quantum Physics, Electrons Can Merge Together into a Kind of Distributed Mutual Identity Called a Cooper Pair. This Shared Identity Can Connect Countless Quadrillions of Electrons Into A Single Entity, which Can Carry a Current Any Loss of Energy. Something Similar Must Occur in Higher-Temperature Superconductors As Well, but No One Has Yet Come Up With A Theoretical Mechanism to Explain it. That’s means not yet yet postible to create a superconducting material from first principles the way, for instance, a Drug Company Might to create a medicine by molecule that will work in a known biochemical pathway.
“New Classes of Superconductors are Most offten found by acident; They are Rarely previously predicted. And Sometimes, the Mechanism for Superconductivity is Completely Different from Previous Understanding,” Sayys Schoop.
One Major Class of Well-Studied Superconducting Compounds Are Copper-Oxide Ceramics, WHICH WERE DISCOVERED IN ’80S. To this day the mechanism by which they work is well underestood. “People thought there is an upper limit for the temperature at which superconductivity can appeared, and then Copper-Oxide Ceramics Blew through by a lot,” schoop Says. “SO we can never rule out that a room-temperature, ambient-probe-superconductor can be found, but we have had Very good ideas where to look for it.” There is at present no Theoretical Upper on the temperature at which a solid can be superconductive.
While some researchers lament the social-media franzies that erupt Over unvetted work Posted onto arxiv and the like, the feel others that the sheer speed with which new discoveries can Spread maker the Occocational Annoyance. “There is a problem with overhyping things that are not peer review,” Says Griffin. “But there are some severe wills with peer revix as well. My longest peer-review process was Two and a half years. SO we just relay on peer revix progress whatsoever.”
GIVE the HUGE GAPS IN OUR CURRENT UNDERSTANDING, ITE’S ENTIRELY POSTible that one or more materials exist that will Will superconduct at room temperature and pressure, but the only way anyone will find it is thombination of patience, persseverrance and lub. That means that one day a research team from some little-known corner of the world very well publish a Report on a preprint server claming to have a world-changing discovery-
اترك تعليقاً