The strangest lawsuits of husbands threatened with imprisonment because of the list of movables, despite the payment of them more than once

The husbands fall into many crises due to List of movablesAnd accusations of the waste that affects them at the hands of the wives when separating and marital disputes between them, in light of the rejection of the wives to solve and sometimes intransigence and the desire to obtain for the list more than once, and the pressures that fall on the husbands and their fear of the issuance of a judicial ruling in light of the legal complications and the rejection of the wives to contract the conciliation.

During the following lines, we monitor the most prominent legal procedures for the list of movables, when the crime of waste begins, what is the penalty for waste, and how the criminal lawsuit expires to the crime of waste, and the strangest cases that the misdemeanors in Cairo and Giza are viewed.

And disperse according to the law, which is the actions that the husband performs with the intention of causing damage to the wife’s movables, and the list of movables is equal to the delivery of the trust in the criminalization material, and the husband is obligated to return it completely in kind in her condition or return its value in cash, and the punishment for “waste of trust” for imprisonment is from 24 hours to 3 years imprisonment.

And the procedures for the claim of waste begin with a report of the incident in the police station affiliated with it, with an original copy of the wife’s movable list and submitted the matter to the competent prosecution and then transferred to the court, and the husband asks the court to enable him to present the movables legally until he disavowed him, and after that a report is issued by what happened during the delivery, after the police previewed the transfer and the wife’s approval of receiving.

The court may issue its ruling in the visible case if the husband refuses to surrender, and the cases of dissipation shall be forfeited by the ruling issued after the expiration of a period of 3 years and the wife loses her right to movables, and the Family Court does not issue a ruling to be imprisoned for the husband in cases of waste, and the court of misdemeanors is concerned, as the crime of dispelling marital movables commit damage to the wife and the ruling of Article 312 of the Penal Code and the stirring of the public prosecution is suspended. About her complaint from the wife -the victim, and the rulings of the Court of Cassation came not to consider the crime of waste in some of its provisions, violating the honor, as it is not parallel to the crimes of theft and the check without balance or adultery, and the delay in fulfilling the list of movables is not sufficient to make it a crime of dispelling, but this must be associated with the departure of the husband’s intention to embezzle with himself and harm the owner of the movables.

According to the law for the husband to submit an appeal against forgery in his favor in the case -to prove that the list is not valid -and he has the right to appeal in the ruling issued by the court within a maximum period of only 10 days of pronouncement of the ruling, and if the ruling was issued against the husband in a final way, the wife has the right to demand the list of her, and the wife of the victim is to raise the criminal and civil lawsuit from her by the direct claim to assign the accused husband directly The wife may demand that material compensation be obtained for the damage that has been subjected to her transfer, and the criminal lawsuit expires with the crime of dispelling marital movables on the death of the accused husband or three years passed from the day of the crime – the date of requesting the movables – and refraining from its response, or the wife’s concession.

A husband complains after his pursuit for the fourth time in the case of dissipation

The husband stood up to help from the material and moral damage he suffered due to the intransigence of his wife and violence after he lived with her in hell-according to his description in response to his accusation of disperse for the fourth time during 5 years of marriage-and her insistence on fabricating the differences and deserting her marital residence, and residing more than once asking for a settlement to divorce and then retreated.

After accusing his wife, the husband affirmed: “I deliberately harmed malicious accusations of dispeling despite obtaining all her rights and the price of the list of movables more than once-according to the documents I submitted to the court, after she forged official documents to harm me, which prompted me to chase her with a misdemeanor before the court, after her blackmail and asked me to pay 820 thousand pounds Documents to demonstrate her fraud with fraud and fraud and that offended on her part.

A husband complains: My wife sold her jewelry, then she was brought up on the pretext of dispelling

The husband did not imagine that his wife would do so, after she fell into him, and she circumvented the harm and moral and material harm to him, after selling her jewelry estimated at 548 thousand pounds and giving them to her brother to pay his debts and save him from prison, and to pursue him on the pretext of dispelling and asking him to return the jewelry or its value.

The husband who filed a lawsuit against his wife, in front of the Family Court in Heliopolis, continued: “My wife abandoned the house and took the jewelry and sold it despite my objection and rejected her actions, to refuse to enable me to see my children, and I fame with my reputation and exposed me, and we destroyed our marriage after 8 years, and despite the financial value of the jewelry to avoid the differences with her, I refused the peace and tried to imprison me.”

A person complains about his wife: I was caught on the pretext of dispelling and divorce 5 months after the marriage

He accused his wife’s husband of getting out of his obedience and abandoning her home, and refused her to return – after his behavior all the friendly ways to resolve the differences with her – and circumventing him for accusing him of dispelling and divorce for the harm even though she was wrong in his right, to confirm: “I found myself pursuing a claim of dispelling after 5 months of marriage, and the situation turned upside down after I was preparing my son’s room that my wife was carrying in front of the family court.”

The husband affirmed a prestige claim against his wife, in front of the Family Court in Heliopolis: “I deserted the house for months, and after her birth the child refused to see him, and I fame with my reputation, and I pursued me with the cases of imprisonment for revenge by me, exceeding 18 cases, unlike the freezing expenses that reached 310 thousand pounds, including the expenses of childbirth, and the value of the list of movables was paid twice to try to contract the conciliation with it.”