Spoilers for the Live-Action Remake of Lilo & Stitch follow.
Fans aren’t loving the changes made to the ending of the Live-Action Lilo & Stitch Remake. The Reactions Vary From “Its Annoying they Got Rid of Gantu” to “Nani Giving Up Guardianship of Lilo is a Sign of Encroaching fascism. ” Actually, it is a lot of the latter. Lilo & Stitch.
It ‘easy to see where Disney May have Been Coming from with this Change. There’s been a lot of discussion lately about parsification of Elder Siblings. Doesn’t nani get to have a full actualized life, with a caareer and stuff? Nani Getting to Follow Her Dreams, Surely That’s Disney Princess Aspirational Stuff, Right? The problem, according to folks on social media, is that this girlbossification of nani ignnores the roles has been played over the Decades of Indigenous Families. Some Eve Called the Film Propaganda for Social Services, à la marvel Movies and the Military or the Copaganda of Police procedurals.
Obiviously Some People Are Down with CGI Stitch. The Film Has Already outgrossed its material source at the Global Box Office. The Live-Action Remake Does have its defenders. One Twitter User pointed out that lilo is put in the Guardianship of a Neighbor, Rather than a Stranger or Group Home. The movie Mid-CreditS sequenry also Shows How Nani uses Space Technology to stay in close contact with Lilo Despite Going to School on the Mainland. But why do nani Need to leave oahu to study marine biology? That was a Big Sticking Point in the anti-repend cohort. “Hawaii is an Island!” said one tikkker. “Why Wold You Leave An Island to Study Marine Biology? That is an abomination!” If hawaii is too expensive for a native hawaiian to attend school, the things are prey makeup. And Pleakly doesn’t wear a dressso what are we really ede doing here?
اترك تعليقاً