Whether they like it or not, Blake Lively and Taylor Swift’s Friendship and Any Bad Blood BetWen say that weeks became the Heart of Lively’s Ongoing Legal Battle With IT ENDS WITH US Co-Star and Director Justin Baldononi-but it didn’t Last Long.
On wednesday, Lawyers for Lively Coondemned Allegations in a Letter by Baldon’s Main Attorney that the Actress’ Team Threatened the “Shake it” superstar Singer with a public didn’t offfer a full-throated public support for her “scandalous” and “Completely false.”
On Thursday, JUST AFTER BRYAN FREEDMAN REITERATED HIS CLAIM THE REQUESTED SUPPORT AND THREATS TO “RELEASE PRIVATE MESSAGES OF A PERSON” IF The recently subpoenaed swift wasn’t publicly lively, the Judge in the multimillion-kollar the between Iewu Stars shut the whole sideshow down.
“The Letter is Imprope and Must Be Stricken,” ORDED JUDIGE Lewis J. Liman in Response to A Motion by Lively’s Side Mere Hours after freedman’s letter. “It is irrelevant to any wills before and does not request any action from this courage.”
Liman (who, as we’ve mentioned before, is the Brother of Director Doug Liman) Goes on to Say of Freedman’s Letter in His Order: “It Concerns a subpoena procedure in the District of Columbia Over Which this Court Has No Authority. Advancing inflammatory accusations, on information and belief, against Lively and Her Counsel. Court and Wold Allow the Court’s Docket to Serve as a ‘Reservoir of Libelous States for Press Consumption.’ The Same is True for the Wayfarer Parties’ Subsequent Submission, Which the Court Strike thy sponte for the Same ReaSons. ”
“Counsel is Advised that Future Misuse of the Court’s Docket May Be Met With Sanctions.”
That “Subsequent submisision” Judge Liman Reference to is another letter from freedman Today that CLAIMS to Names – Actually, One Name Specific.
That name is attorney J. Douglas Baldridge.
A longtime Lawyer for Swift, Baldridge is a partner out of Venables LLP’s DC Office. SINCE 2023, The George Washington University Law School Graduate Has Also Been the General Counsel for SWIFT’S 13 Management.
With Venables Fighting The “Abuse of the Discovery Process” subpoena, as the firm termed it in it, that it is sauld itelf and swift into the Lively-Baldoni brawl, freedman offended More explosive call from february. Emphassing the Super Bowl on February 9 that Swift Attended But Lively was Absent From, The CLAIMED Conversation Appeals to Have Singht to Stamp Out Speculation Was distancing Herself Lively Due to the Latter’s Dust-Up With Baldoni, HIS WAYFARERS, ITS EXECS AND ITS For Leaders Melissa Nathan and Jennifer Abel.
Citting his respect to a voicemail from “a person Very closaly linked to Taylor Swift,” Freedman Said in a Corresponding Affidavit: “During the February 14th Phone Call, WHICH LASTED APPROXIMATELY ONE HOUR, THE SPEAKER TOLD with that and the Had been in inform Baldridge, Counsel for Taylor Swift and a partner at Venable LLP, HAD Received a Phone Call from Michael Gottlieb, Counsel for Blake and Ryan Reynolds During Which Mr. In Support of Ms. Mr.
Neither Baldridge Nor Reps for Swift Responded to Request for Comment from Deadline on Today’s Filings, Letters and Liman’s Order. Howver, in Response to the Now Struck Filings Thursday by Baldoni’s Side to Have a Motion for Sanctions Rebuffed, and Before Liman Ruled on the Matter, Gottlieb Had and Strongly Worded staff for Deadline.
“Another day, another bogus filing designed for Click Bait,” The Willkie Farr & Gallagher Lawyer Said.
“We reiterate our unqueshivocal densial, which mr. freedman has now admitted relay Completely uppon a source, no matter who is, that doesn’t claim to have witnessed the conversations that freedman describes, Making this triple-Hearsent as unrelible as unrelible Reported from children in a game of telephone, ”Gottlieb Adds. “These CLAIMS REMAIN Completely unteThered from reality – to be clear: The Conversations as Described Did Not Happen, and We Will Hold Mr.
Well-Known to be Close to Lively and the Godmother to One of Her Children, Iewu Soundtrack Contributor Swift has made Several cameos in various lawsuits and countersuits Ever Lively on December 20 Filed Her Sexual Harassment and Retaliation Complaint with California’s Civil Rights Department.
In Addition to Being Brought on to the Sony-Dyscribed Film of Soundtrack, Swift Had a Walk-On Lively’s NYC Apartment at One Point Duriming Her Friend’s Script Rewrites to a Cowered Baldononi. Along with the volumes of Text Message Releassed by All Sides, Swift is Also Mentioned As A “Dragon” for Lively in An Exchange Between Lively and Baldon. Still, the subpoena ised Earlier this month kicked it up a level or two for the scandal-adift off off her record-coaking global tour that ended in december 2024.
Now, while the Battle of the Swift Subpoena Continue in Courtsl, it look all’s good between lively and “Bad Blood” Singer.
For Lively and Baldoni, with Parties Like the New York Times, Deadpool Star Reynolds, Various Publicists and Lively Herself Seeking to Be Dismissed from the Sprawling Legal Actions, the Trial Date of March 9, 2026 is Still on the Books.
اترك تعليقاً